eight five.41 ten.eight 21.6 54.1 VA 1.ten 5.50 11.0 22.0 55.0 B 1.22 6.12 12.two 24.five 61.two T 1.21 six.03 12.1 24.1 60.3 S 1.26 6.28 12.six 25.1 62.8 pX 1.20 5.99 12.0 24.0 59.9 mX 1.20 five.99 12.0 24.0 59.9 oX 1.20 5.98 12.0 23.9 59.8 MEK 1.12 five.58 11.2 22.3 55.eight MIBK 1.12 five.59 11.2 22.three 55.9 iBuAl 1.11 five.55 11.1 22.2 55.5 BuAc 1.23 six.14 12.3 24.five 61.4 PPA 1.37 6.86 13.7 27.four 68.six BTA 1.33 6.64 13.3 26.six 66.four IVA 1.28 6.41 12.8 25.6 64.1 VLA 1.30 6.50 13.0 26.0 65.14 70 140 280Analysis volume: 1 LSensors 2013, 13 Table 3S. Comparison of calibration results determined at the get started and end of experiments: Response aspect (RF), coefficient of determination (R2), and relative normal errors (RSE).Order 1 2 three four 5 6 7 8 9 ten 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Group Compound Exp_day 0 AA PA BA IA VA B T S pX mX oX MEK MIBK iBuAl BuAc PPA BTA IVA VLA Imply SD 522 12,017 43,572 66,125 59,322 131,760 168,602 188,198 188,510 197,068 198,376 48,980 117,383 93,667 113,114 25,574 71,259 99,441 79,615 RF Exp_day 9 497 11,950 43,467 65,836 59,804 131,280 165,819 191,709 184,038 193,888 194,140 48,566 117,646 92,778 117,791 26,963 67,832 94,589 78,950 Imply 509.five 11,984 43,520 65,981 59,563 131,520 167,211 189,954 186,274 195,478 196,258 48,773 117,515 93,223 115,453 26,269 69,546 97,015 79,283 CVb three.47 0.40 0.17 0.31 0.57 0.26 1.18 1.31 1.70 1.15 1.53 0.60 0.16 0.67 two.86 3.74 three.48 three.54 0.59 1.46 1.29 Exp_day 0 0.9619 0.9991 0.9963 0.9962 0.9973 0.9909 0.9995 0.9995 0.9997 0.9992 0.9991 0.9969 0.9998 0.9969 0.9982 0.9977 0.9963 0.9965 0.9918 R2 Exp_day 9 0.9698 0.9991 0.9938 0.9932 0.9973 0.9930 0.9995 0.9997 0.9987 0.9994 0.9991 0.9987 0.9985 0.9972 0.9973 0.9953 0.9967 0.9935 0.9925 RSE a ( ) Mean 0.9659 0.9991 0.9951 0.9947 0.9973 0.9920 0.9995 0.9996 0.9992 0.9993 0.9991 0.9978 0.9992 0.9971 0.9978 0.9965 0.9965 0.9950 0.9922 0.9954 0.0075 2.52 3.49 1.05 1.93 1.35 2.06 0.83 1.32 0.49 0.56 0.73 1.79 0.85 1.73 0.79 1.68 0.13 two.09 0.97 1.39 0.AldehydeAromaticKetone Alcohol Ester Carboxyla bFive replicate analyses of 26.1 ng (mean mass) of analytes per 1 injection of FWS (4th calibration point) L CV (coefficient of variation) = SD/mean Sensors 2013, 13 Table 4S. Comparison of RF values amongst actual experiment plus the powerful carbon quantity (ECN) method.Order Group Compounds Quick name C Ib Quantity of atom and functional groupa H O (C=O) (O) Jb Kb Lb Mb ECNc (CH3) Nb Actucal exp RF values ECN approachd PDe1 2 three four 5 six 7 eight 9 ten 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18aAldehydeAcetaldehyde Propionaldehyde Butyraldehyde Isovaleraldehyde nValeraldehyde Benzene Toluene Styrene pXylene mXylene oXylene Methyl ethyl ketone Methyl isobutyl ketone Isobutyl alcohol nButyl acetate Propionic acid nButyric acid iValeric acid nValeric acidAA PA BA IA VA B T S pX mX oX MEK MIBK iBuAl BuAc PPA BTA IVA VLA2 three 4 five five 6 7 eight 8 eight 8 4 6 4 six 3 4 54 6 eight ten ten 6 8 eight 10 ten 10 eight 12 10 12 six 6 101 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 2 2 2 21 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 ten 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 2 1 0 1 0 2 2 two two 3 2 2 1 1 21.Methyl 3-(1H-pyrrol-2-yl)propanoate Chemscene 06 1.4-Fluoropicolinaldehyde Purity 99 2.PMID:23398362 92 four.00 three.85 five.79 six.87 7.72 7.95 7.95 7.95 3.07 five.08 4.50 5.48 2.54 3.54 4.55 4.510 11,984 43,520 65,981 59,563 131,520 167,211 189,954 186,274 195,478 196,258 48,773 117,515 93,223 115,453 26,269 69,546 97,015 79,15,532 12,921 41,375 74,418 69,828 129,183 162,226 188,232 195,269 195,269 195,269 45,964 107,460 89,715 119,698 29,748 60,344 91,245 86,7.82 4.93 12.8 17.two 1.78 2.98 0.91 4.83 0.11 0.50 five.76 eight.56 3.76 3.68 13.two 13.two five.95 9.AromaticKetone Alcohol Ester Fatty acidMean:six.52 .Car or truck.